Thursday, May 18, 2006

Recent News Links


Just for those that don't keep up with the "current news" link for Woodford County over at www.woodfordtaxfacts.com, here are the "award winning" submissions from local sources (April-May to date):


Vote to upgrade state's attorney's office fails
Plan would have boosted pay, added staff
Posted On: 18-May-2006
Law library named in honor of deputy clerk
still going strong at aged 76
Posted On: 18-May-2006
Expert to speak on freight trends at TransPORT spring luncheon
Consultant To Speak
Posted On: 17-May-2006
Woodford administrator gets early $4,000 pay raise
Jackson is "shocked"
Posted On: 17-May-2006
ICC to see drop in state funds
College had expected to see hike in cash
Posted On: 14-May-2006
Fieldcrest Board's CAC To Change Approach
Panel won't be involved in collecting student fees
Posted On: 8-May-2006
Roanoke-Benson mulls math changes curriculum
Board To Meet To Authorize Math Changes
Posted On: 8-May-2006
Senate passes tax cap reform
Lawmakers say bill helps taxpayers, school districts
Posted On: 5-May-2006
Woodford to aid Tazewell tax mailings
Consultant 'to guide the ship and give direction'
Posted On: 4-May-2006
Proposal may lift sales tax on fuel
But some officials say bill won't help consumers
Posted On: 27-Apr-2006
Woodford considers safety-tax cut
Losing fuel tax may help businesses seeking relief
Posted On: 26-Apr-2006
Dangerous dogs a growing concern
Woodford County considers ordinance for developing areas
Posted On: 24-Apr-2006
State House Cracking Down On Eminent Domain
measure goes back to Senate
Posted On: 21-Apr-2006
Tazwell property owners weren't taxed in 2003 or 2004
assesments still being logged
Posted On: 21-Apr-2006
Woodford County To Observe Government Week
Open Houses Planned
Posted On: 20-Apr-2006
Woodford board hires IT specialist
Eurkea High employee will be part of intergovernmental agreement
Posted On: 19-Apr-2006
Bond House Gives IL Negative Rating Over Pensions
$39 BILLION funding shortfall
Posted On: 14-Apr-2006
Whose Money Is It?
Fox/Opinion Dynamics Poll On Taxes
Posted On: 12-Apr-2006
Metamora man denies zoning offense
State's Attorney Investigating
Posted On: 12-Apr-2006
New index could drop farmland values
30-year-old assessment method being replaced
Posted On: 11-Apr-2006
Surprise! We Sold Your House
Foreclosure practices changing?
Posted On: 11-Apr-2006
"65%" Solution To School Funding Gains Momentum
States attempt to force money into the classroom
Posted On: 11-Apr-2006
Blagojevich's Legacy
Illinois Ranks 46th in Job Growth
Posted On: 10-Apr-2006
Raceway development agreement passes 1st step
Minonk and developers yet to sign
Posted On: 10-Apr-2006
Higher Sales Tax Revenue Expected in Eureka
$3.1 million in expenses
Posted On: 10-Apr-2006
Opinion From JournalStandard.com
Protecting our property rights
Posted On: 6-Apr-2006
Zogby Poll: Dems Hold Their Edge; But Topinka Still in Range
Blagojevitch leads despite difficulty
Posted On: 6-Apr-2006

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Woodford County Real Estate Tax Extensions






























Here is the companion for our recently posted 2004 extensions in Woodford County.

The variance in overall extensions from 2004 to 2005 appears to us to come in at + 4.6% year to year.

Here is a little backup data going back to 1994:

Total Property Tax Extensions for Woodford County for the last 12 years-
1994 $23.811888 millions
1995 $25.977666 millions
1996 $27.843948 millions
1997 $30.550720 millions
1998 $32.743957 millions
1999 $33.954361 millions
2000 $35.641961 millions
2001 $38.121309 millions
2002 $39.864363 millions
2003 $42.728191 millions
2004 $45.046906 millions
2005 $47.111284 millions

Right off the bat you can easily tell that from '94 to this year the billings went up 98%, or an average of 8.9% per annum.


Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Public Libraries or Internet Portals?


Here's another local article speaking to our Public Libraries' identity crises.

We get a little concerned with publicly funded entities thinking they have somehow received a mandate to be the information gatekeepers - most especially when they are part of the ALA.

The American Library Association are the ones that want your kids to be able to go to the library and log-on to any site that they wish - forget the morality or safety concerns. They also do not want anyone, ever, to have any oversight over what occurs with their portals. This is not to imply that your own local library is unsafe for your kids - quite the contrary. However, the ALA is the activist wing and political action entity which your library supports, and thus, so do your tax and donation dollars.

The ALS (Alliance Library System) is the more localized wing. Take a look at just a couple of items:

http://www.alliancelibrarysystem.com/article.cfm?id=989

http://www.alliancelibrarysystem.com/article.cfm?id=982

These are your tax dollars at work.

Now, our libraries seem to want to establish their own proprietary "Google". They seem to feel that will keep public libraries viable.

With the number of private initiatives like Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, not to mention NetFlix, the coming "TV on demand" thing, do we really need a library to compete in these areas by offering net access, DVDs, CDs, and video games?

Real World Property Taxes - Redux

We promised to keep updating real Woodford County residents' tax bills as they come in.

Here's an update:











(Click on the chart to enlarge for visibility)
Use your "back" button to return.

Monday, May 15, 2006

Eureka Public Library District - New Building Referendum?


We had the unusual opportunity to catch the Eureka Public Library District Board meeting on Monday night last

It was incredibly interesting. Much of the meeting was centered around thoughts of some sort of expansion, demolition, and/or relocation of the library.

We heard no budgetary numbers attached to these various options. Apparently, the original facility was essentially a gift from a Eureka resident and is "trusteed" by a church. There is also a State of Illinois historic preservation situation involved with a potential move.

Additionally, the board unanimously approved a 5% pay increase for library staff, and it was mentioned that much of the budgetary pressure was coming from I.M.R.F. contributions, which, it was stated, "we have no control over - it's State mandated".

Computer and software updates were also mentioned as needing monetary attention.

Morphing the library to more of a "community center" was discussed.

We may be way off on this - but it is our opinion that Public Libraries are desperately scrambling for relevance and a customer base.

Let's face it - folks aren't reading like they used to and if the libraries are to become "internet access points" why do they even need a complex at all? Are we to fund these things as book and computer warehouses?

Eureka, and many other libraries are in danger of losing their "warm and fuzzy" support from the tax paying folks that regard them with nostalgia as historic, iconic, and cultural reference points - places which they would endow from their estates when they die.

We would humbly submit that the libraries take a little break, take a few deep breaths, and consider what their missions should be in terms of their communities' wishes and history, rather than trying to create demand for something that perhaps isn't wanted or needed.

The public library system should not be a social service agency, nor a jobs program. If it is to be "public" it should serve genuine public needs. If it is to be private and privately endowed, it can make it's own mission, but it must create that without funding from property taxes, federal and state grants, or other public funds.

Take a look at this article from the Christian Science Monitor:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0725/p02s02-ussc.html

Letters From: the "Silent Majority"


This is from a letter which Newt Gingrich received after his last Sunday appearance on "Meet The Press" with Tim Russert on NBC.

"You are in a rare position for a public servant: you have found a way to make telling the truth a convincing political strategy. I think it really works on foreign and domestic policy, and I think it works when you talk about your own personal history in the face of hostile questions. When you do America the simple courtesy of speaking honestly, plainly and sympathetically, you tap huge reserves of goodwill and in the process make Americans feel better about themselves."


Speaker Gingrich has a lot of baggage to haul, but boy, we sure like his positive, inclusive and none-the-less fiscally conservative views and his appreciation of history.

Mr. Gingrich thinks America is ready for someone willing to speak the truth and "the folks" are crying out for leaders that have fiscal conservatism in their blood. We do too. It doesn't matter what label you use - progressive, Democrat, Libertarian, Republican, Conservative, Liberal, Independent - the voters seem ready for the real deal.

Stay tuned.

Sunday, May 14, 2006

Let The Tax Referenda Marketing Begin


The Peoria Journal Star had an article today featuring I.C.C. President John Erwin lamenting the unfairness of the projected State of Illinois funding of Illinois Central College.

While we agree with him that the giant sucking sound from up north is getting intolerable to we "downstate farmers", we also hear in Mr. Erwin's outrage the seeds of a tax referendum which will enable the pouring of more concrete over at ICC.

These seeds are sprouting vigorously in Woodford County. We hear murmurs from Fieldcrest School District, El Paso/Gridley, ICC, and others - not necessarily school taxing authorities.

Some may have merit, but the burden of proof lies with the taxing authority - not the tax payers. Let's nip this in the bud now. It is NOT a revenue problem, it is a spending problem. We refuse to be taxed out of our homes, regardless of where the State of Illinois' funding levels for local taxing bodies fall.

Saturday, May 13, 2006

"Regressive" Taxation Hypocrisy


Every Spring when the IRS comes calling, and local Real Estate Tax bills arrive, talk turns to how "unfair" taxation is in this country - "tax cuts for the richest 1%", etc.

The tax-spenders want more money and on the surface decry anything resembling everyone paying the same rate of tax on anything. They feel that those that have more should pay a greater percentage to the communal pot (for the social "experts" to spend). This is the concept of "progressive" taxation.

We are constantly amazed at the silence of these folks on the most regressive taxes of all - property, cigarettes, alcohol, and most insidious, state lotteries.

It is extremely difficult to get a hold of State "target demographic" marketing data. They don't want to talk about it. However, WoodfordTaxFacts.com has obtained some of this information and it is stunning.

Essentially, what we need to understand is that those most prone to smoking, drinking, and gambling with "lotteries" are at the lowest rungs of the socio-economic ladder. These taxes are a disproportionate burden on the undereducated, elderly, and immigrant populations. They always have been and they always will be.

The Real Estate tax as we've discussed many times is a tax on savings, not income, and burdens those on fixed incomes the most (read - low income/retired/elderly).

Where is the "progressives' " outrage? As an aside, how can you have "sin taxes" on certain behavior/consumption and then "profit" from same in the form of taxation? The status quo indicates it can be politically justified by putting those monies into "education, training, treatment, and heathcare" programs. However in Illinois, after the promises faded, the monies end up in the "General Fund" anyway. Remember when the Illinois Lottery was instituted? The sales pitch was that gambling (the numbers racket) was going on anyway, and why not just have the state horn in on the illegal enterprises and take a piece of that pie. Who could complain? That was supposed to be a property tax relief deal for education funding. It was going to go into the proverbial "lock-box".

The huge hike in tobacco taxes and the lawsuit settlements (tax) on "Big Tobacco"? That was to go into Medicare. The State is still not paying doctors and hospitals for 18 months.

Beer, wine, and liquor license fee increases and excise taxes? Well, those were always intended to ease the transition from prohibition and were to go into prevention and care of abusers; never happened.

So next time your friends complain about how the poor and middle class pay too much tax relative to "the rich", remind them that an easy way to put real money into low income pockets would be to eliminate the aforementioned taxes, get rid of the lottery, and gently remind them that less than half of all Americans pay any federal income tax.

Next up - we'll discuss the federal "Earned Income Tax Credit" monies gushing out to Mexico via illegals living here, but legally able to file and claim dependents back home. Anything we can do to help out Mexico . . .

Friday, May 12, 2006

Local School District Spending Reprint - by request


We promised a group that we'd post this again for easy access.

Please forgive the repetition.

The numbers from left to right for Olympia School District are:

2,231
-6.69%
$7,826
18.99%
$6,258
18.84%
"no" as far as the "65% solution"

(Click on the above chart to enlarge.)

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Ethanol Source Switch To Switchgrass?


The U.S. government gives refineries a tax incentive or subsidy of 51 cents for each gallon of ethanol they blend with gasoline.

Last week President George W. Bush said Congress should drop a 54 cent-per-gallon tariff on ethanol imports from Brazil.

The Brazilians say they will be "energy independent" next year, although their fuel usage is miniscule compared to the U.S. Brazil, and much of the rest of the world, process sugar cane and switchgrass for bio fuels.

Demand for ethanol may someday outpace the ability of U.S. farmers to produce corn (the year 2025 is bandied about). Sugar growers have enjoyed Federal protection and largesse since the hay-days in Cuba. This new vision is one of a nation dependent on switchgrass as the key feed for ethanol production.

It takes about 6 to 8 years to develop the switchgrass enzyme conversion technology sufficient for ethanol production plant practicability, according to our sources.

O.K. So here's the question - do we want to eliminate the (primarily) Brazilian tariff, or do we want to continue subsidizing domestic production with the tariff in addition to all of the other ethanol/sugar incentives and mandates?

In this corner . . . A.D.M,

In this corner . . . Cargill . . .

we'll let you figure out who is whom in the ring and why.

That Ever Louder Sucking Sound From Up North

Here's a surprise. It seems (according to the Chicago Tribune) that head of the Chicago Public Schools, Arne Duncan, doesn't think the "new" State moneys in the Springfield "budget" will be nearly enough:

Chicago will get about $100million extra in general state funds, allowing the district to take off the table a threat to increase class sizes, Duncan said. Chicago also will get another $16million to help reduce its deficit, according to state officials.

Even with the extra state funds, the district may have to increase property taxes, Duncan said.
It makes one wonder if there could ever be enough money, doesn't it?

Crazy Like A Fox!

Just when one thinks one has seen about everything - Matt Drudge today reports that Rupert Murdoch (yes, that Rupert Murdoch - Fox News, NewsCorp., N.Y. Post) has agreed to host at least one Fund Raiser for Hillary Clinton in the near future, according to The Financial Times.

Monday, May 08, 2006

Assessor Assesses Property Tax Health


We stumbled across this quotation from a letter to the Chicago Tribune dated February 26, 2006:

". . . At one time, property was the driving force in the economy, creating wealth and producing incomes. Since property is no longer the force driving the economy, it can no longer be the main force driving tax revenues.

The first step to fixing the system is to substantially reduce the over-reliance on property taxes. The lost revenue needs to be replaced with a tax that covers all economic activity. Only when the property tax is no longer holding up the whole house will we be able to make the necessary major repairs."

James M. Houlihan
Assessor
Cook County
Chicago

Letters From: Champaign, Illinois

Toward a Living Wage

May 02, 2006
John Bambenek

After attending the annual Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) Leadership Conference in Indianapolis, one of the things I thought about was a living wage. The argument by many of the participants was that the best way to lift people out of poverty and provide a living wage was to provide a robust economy — basically, trickle-down economics. Even Thomas Woods' talk, which had a religious character, had this general idea. In fact, when he was asked to reconcile St. Peter's teaching on obedience to the government with disagreement on welfare policy, he largely fumbled the answer, in my opinion. I favor my response to the question.

The problem with talking about a living wage is that it always talks about the issue from only one end of it. Either you have to artificially raise wages or trickle-down will raise wages. Still, this only talks about the problem from the aspect of raising the amount of money getting paid. There is another way to get to a living wage: decrease the cost of living so that current wages are sufficient.

Increasing wages by raising the minimum wage is an unsatisfactory solution by itself. There is a finite amount of money going around and all things being equal, a business will offset increased costs by cutting costs elsewhere. In the realm of employment, they will usually not hire as many people or not pay people above the minimum wage as generously (i.e. stagnate wages at the minimum wage line). It presents an intractable problem. What is better — 90% employment at 80% of a living wage, or 80% employment at 90% of a living wage? Costs could be cut elsewhere, but businesses already have the incentive to do that. Creating a burden is unlikely to help them be more efficient. This skips past that difficultly of setting a living wage (for what type of living arrangement) and that some people shouldn't be paid a living wage (high school students, college students, temporary workers).

This also can lead to inflation because any cost a business incurs will be passed on in its prices. Those increased labor costs will get passed on again and again to the only entity that is unable to pass off costs. We'll call that person "the consumer." We could theoretically determine a living wage at some snapshot in time and mandate that all workers be paid that wage. Even if there is no additional unemployment, that increased labor cost will result in increased prices across the board. This translates to an increased cost of living and makes the living wage insufficient once the costs pass through the system. Even if you could control the rate of employment, there is no way to set a living wage. It would increase the cost of living and make that living wage insufficient again.

The solution to this problem is to stop focusing on the size of the paycheck and to start focusing on the cost of living. There are several components that make up the cost of living. There is food and the sales tax to buy that food. There is housing and the property tax levied against that property. There is medicine, government fees, income tax, etc.

One way to cut the cost of living directly and immediately is to cut taxes. This can be accomplished be getting rid of wasteful and unnecessary government spending which is always inefficient and bleeds money away from the economy. Even welfare payments bleed money off that remains in the black hole of Washington DC.

Another way is to decrease transaction costs for people doing business. For instance, the legal and insurance systems allow for businesses to not only prepay their future lawsuit settlements, but also provide a nice way to compartmentalize those costs and pass them on to the consumer. The dirty little secret about suing companies is that they aren't the ones paying — society is. And in fact, you've already paid.

Likewise, property tax gets passed down to renters in the form of higher rents. Sales tax raises prices for consumer goods. Higher business taxes make for higher prices. Increased regulation makes for higher regulation costs and higher prices.

To effectively reduce the cost of living, every regulation, every tax, and every wasteful or unnecessary government spending initiative needs to be stopped. There are important regulations and things the government should tax and spend money on. However, it will always spend money inefficiently and bleed money away from the economy when they do it. This needs to be minimized.

Productivity gains, increases in efficiency of production and distribution, and new technologies will also help (as it always has) to increase the quality of life of all workers. This is where trickle-down is most helpful. However, it's only part of the solution.

The more the cost of living can be reduced by reducing the bleeding effect of government spending and regulation, the more people there will be living above the poverty line.

(John Bambenek is an academic professional for the University of Illinois and a columnist for the Daily Illini and blogs at Part-Time Pundit deep from the corn fields of Illinois.)




Woodford County Pension Costs

What does this picture tell us?

















Well, first off a little clarification on data. The information comes from the recently released annual financial audit.

SLEP = Sheriff's Law Enforcement Personnel
ECO = Elected County Officials
OQE = (all) Other Qualified Employees

Now, here are the compounded average percent increases for these classifications:

SLEP +34%
ECO +39%
OQE +40%

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see there is potentially an elephant in the budgetary closet here.

We're not sure what or where the '05 cost data is; still hunting.

2007 State of Illinois Budget Summary


. . . and the State of Illinois is . . . tenuous at best
. . . Here's a "budget" summary:


Overview

  • General Funds spending of $25.8 billion is up $1.4 billion or about 6%;
  • The four-year total for the Blagojevich administration is $3.5 billion more than when he took office, or $1 billion more than the $2.5 billion increase Illinois saw during George Ryan’s tenure.
  • More than $250 million in spending added to the Governor’s original budget proposal in order to get it passed.

Record-Setting Budget

  • State Government spending at an all-time high;
  • State debt is at an all-time high;
  • Backlog of unpaid bills at an all-time high;
  • Under-funds the worst funded pension system in the nation;
  • Sets the stage for future pension raids;
  • Ignores warnings of Fitch Ratings, making a downgrade almost inevitable;
  • Illinois is 45th in the Nation in Job Growth since Blagojevich took office, trailing all other surrounding states.

Aren’t You Glad You Are Paying?

  • $1 million for Bullying Prevention;
  • $30,000 for an exhibit to honor legislators from Chicago State University;
  • $200,000 to NEIU to conduct a study on the North Atlantic Slave Trade;
  • More than $7 million in lump sums for the Department of Human Services for undisclosed uses;
  • $50,000 for the South Suburban Disproportionate Minority Confinement Foundation;
  • To cover the cost of insurance for the same-sex domestic partners of state employees.

Education Funding

Education gets $438 million increase. (Financed by short-changing the Teachers’ Retirement System by $495 million. Once again teachers are forced to use their own pension system to fund education in Illinois.)

How the education money is allocated:

  • $170 increase in the foundation level to $5,334 at a cost of $239 million
  • $56.7 million increase for Mandated Categoricals (which mainly benefit suburban schools. The $239 million to $56.7 million ratio (less than one to four) is about half the traditional ratio of one to two);
  • $10 million increase for flat per-pupil grants;
  • $45 million for the Governor’s Universal Pre-school initiative;
  • $10 million for class-size reduction grants.

Veterans Scholarships

  • No money added to the budget to pay for the Governor’s Veterans Scholarships which means the schools (and therefore other students) end up footing the bill.

Pension Raid Continues as Planned

  • Budget underfunds worst funded pension systems in the nation by $1.1 billion;
  • Budget does nothing to reverse the expected rating downgrade predicted by Fitch Ratings;
  • Budget does nothing to prevent more post-election raids;
  • Teachers Retirement System shorted by $495 million;
  • State Universities Retirement System shorted by $140 million;
  • Other systems shorted by $498 million;

Chicago Teachers Pensions

  • The final budget adds $10 million for Chicago Teachers Pension
  • Chicago Teachers Pension System gets fully funded ($75.2 million, up $300,000 from last year)
  • Chicago Plan is 80% funded, while TRS is 60% funded.

Now think about your own personal household or small business budget for 2007. Would you ever dream of doing these kinds of things? We think our favorite line item is the $1 million for "bullying prevention".

Friday, May 05, 2006

Illinois Budget Passes; Legislators Raise Own Pay

The Illinois House and Senate did such a great job with the budget that they decided to allow themselves nearly 10% raises.

The increased legislative base pay rises to $63,149, up from $57,619 annually. The governor also gets a raise of nearly $12,000, putting his salary over the $162,000 mark.

This budget "process" was a joke. Now we won't suggest that this "lockout" of the party "out of power" began with the Democrat party. Far from it; it's been going on for decades, but if Republicans ever do take over, you'd better watch out. They will long remember what has happened here and the results will be uglier than ever.

At any rate, we should all push our legislators to reject these raises in the fall "veto" session.

Saturday, April 29, 2006

U.S. Citizens Are Decent And Slow To Anger - But . . .!

We just had the "pleasure" of listening to the crass commercial exploitation of a very emotional issue represented by this pathetic "Spanish" United States of America national anthem- you may hear it while viewing an English translation at NPR's website.

The translation follows below. Read it carefully.

This is terrorism pure and simple, and self-respecting, law-abiding immigrants in the U.S. should be outraged. The general media has portrayed this as simply a Spanish "version" of OUR national anthem. The reality is something different. It has been rewritten.

These lyrics are a declaration of war on the United States. With no changes to the English translation, it could have been written by the old Soviets, the modern North Koreans, the Iranian President, Radical Islamicists- ala Al Qaeda- , Chavez in Venezuela, or Castro in Cuba; the list is long and varied, but the resentment, hatred, lust, jealousy, and self-pity remains the same.

Our citizenry is slow to anger, and generally patient and kind - but beware - two can play at these games. We can't help the past. We've made mistakes. We've made some sacrifices. We won't, however, let demagogues define our future.

Here's the translation:

" By the light of the dawn, do you see arising,


what we proudly hailed at twilight's last fall?

Its stars, its stripes

yesterday streamed

above fierce combat

a gleaming emblem of victory

and the struggle toward liberty.

Throughout the night, they proclaimed:

"We will defend it!"

(Chant:

It’s time to make a difference the kids, men and the women/Let’s stand for our beliefs, let’s stand for our vision/What about the children los ninos como

These kids have no parents, cause all of these mean laws.
See this can’t happen, not only about the Latins.

Asians, blacks and whites and all they do is adding
more and more, let’s not start a war

with all these hard workers,
they can’t help where they were born.)


Tell me! Does its starry beauty still wave

above the land of the free,

the sacred flag?

Its stars, its stripes,

liberty, we are the same.

We are brothers in our anthem.

In fierce combat, a gleaming emblem of victory

and the struggle toward liberty.

My people fight on.

The time has come to break the chains.

Throughout the night they proclaimed, "We will defend it!"

Tell me! Does its starry beauty still wave

above the land of the free,

the sacred flag? "


Patriotism for one's adopted home or "reconquista" jihad?

God bless all citizens of the United States of America and their guests.

Letters From: Pekin, Illinois

Folks, there is a teacher lobby group called “A+ Illinois” going around the state asking school boards and other elected and private bodies to support a resolution, demanding lawmakers provide a different method of funding education.

Typically, they are using the same old tired story of how this is needed for fairness to students, to hide the real deal, more money for the system to abuse. The new method of funding is a large hike in income and sales taxes! The new funding method DOES NOT lower property taxes!

Below are state figures for the past fifteen years that show the increases that involve education. It is CLEAR, money is NOT the problem. The problem is the “lack” of accountability for those spending the ever growing “Billions” they do get. This history proves more tax monies will not help students, but only the bureaucracy who uses students for camouflage!


(15 Year Consumer Price Index = 39.2%)

Illinois Education "State Report Card" Information 1990 - 2005 :

Total Education Dollars (Billion) 2005 : $6,966,200,000 - $3,487,500,000 (1990) = $3,478,700,000 (99.7%) 15 Year Increase

General State Aid Dollars (Billion) 2005 : $3,712,331,000 - $2,077,733,000 (1990) = $1,634,598,000 (78.7%) 15 Year Increase

Operating Dollars Per Student 2005 : $8,786 - $4,519 (1990) = $4,267 (94.4%) 15 Year Increase

Student Enrollment 2005 : 2,062,912 - 1,766,186 (1990) = 296,726 (16.8%) 15 Year Increase

Teachers 2005: 128,079 - 101,732 (1990) = 26,347 (25.9%) 15 Year Increase

Administrators 2005 : 9,847 - 7,110 (1990) = 2,737 (38.5%) 15 Year Increase

Avg. Administration Salary 2005: $97,051 - $52,564 (1990) = $44,487 (84.6%) 15 Year Increase

Avg. Teacher Salary 2005 : $55,558 - $32,925 (1990) = $22,633 (68.7%) 15 Year Increase

Percent Of Students "NOT" Meeting Standards In Reading 2005 : 47.5% - 25% (1992) = 15.5% A 13 Year "Failure Increase" !

Percent Of Students "NOT" Meeting Standards In Math 2005 : 47.2% - 34% (1992) = 13.2% A 13 Year "Failure Increase" !

Percent Of Students Graduating 2005 : 87.4% - 80.8% (1992) = 6.6% A 13 Year Increase "Inspite Of The Failure Increases" !


Sincerely,

Jim Mangan, Pekin, Illinois

What Do You Pay In Taxes?


Quick, how much total do you pay in taxes? Perhaps the greatest innovation of bureacrats in the 20th century was the tax load shell game - the clever balkanization of the tax load that makes it nearly impossible for the average person to truly know how much they pay in taxes to the government.

Start with income taxes. April 15 is long gone for this year, but even so, how many people know how much they paid in income taxes last year? For many people, this is the single largest expense they have, but the total amount is disguised by the fact that most income taxes are taken out as direct payroll deduction. Governent employees everywhere in the US should get up in the morning and give thanks for direct payroll deduction -- without it, if every American had to write a single check once a year for the sum total of their annual income taxes, there would have long since been a revolution.

OK, so you don't know how much you paid in federal, state and local income taxes. But in addition to that, how much did you pay in social security and medicare (typically about 8% of salary)? Property taxes (typically 1-2% of your home value)? How about sales taxes (typically 6-9% of your purchases)? What about vehicle licensing fees and special taxes on hotels and airfare and rent carsand fuel? If you add all these up, the average American pays about 30% of his/her salary in taxes. The Tax Foundation has a great chart summarizing this shell game, with relative burdens expressed as days of work each year required to pay the tax. Note that on average, your federal income tax is only 1/3 of the total of what you are paying:

So those are the direct ones, but how much are you also paying in higher prices due to government import duties? What about the 8% FICA and medicare that employers pay on your behalf - how much higher might your salary be and how much lower the cost of the products you buy if they did not have to pay these? What about corporate taxes - you may not pay them directly, but they certainly get passed on to you in the form of higher prices and lower dividends on your 401k.

We won't even get into the confiscatory nature of "Death", "Property", and "Capital Gains" taxes. While certainly less hidden, they are perhaps the most insidious, since they are a tax savings and not income or spending.

- - - the Coyote

Friday, April 28, 2006

Woodford White Hats To The Rescue!


This from the PJS's editorial page - their "Thumbs Up" thing:

Friday, April 28, 2006

To Woodford County officials for agreeing to help Tazewell County get its tax bills in order. Under the agreement, Woodford Supervisor of Assessments Laurie Epkins will train new Tazewell employees in processing tax bills. Tazewell tax bills may be as much as two months late this year, in part because there's been so much turnover in the assessment office there. The delayed tax bills cost every Tazewell government money, because they either have to borrow in the interim or fail to earn interest. Counties must get bills out on time. This type of intergovernmental cooperation ought to help. There should be more of it.


Last we knew from the Journal Star's Award Winning Editorial Board [nod to PeoriaPundit], we were the backward hicks of the Tri-County area, capable only of bickering amongst ourselves. Glad we could help out, and a tip o' the hat to our Ms. Epkins and the PJS.

Would A Tax Extension Limitation Law for Woodford County make a difference?

Here is the change in the Consumer Price Index (inflation), year-to-year from 1990-2004.















Now here's the change in Woodford County's EAV (property tax) for those same years.

It's a little hard to read, but notice that the compound annual growth rate is 6.9% while inflation based on the CPI index was just under 3.1%.

Theoretically, the Property Tax Extension Liability Law (PTELL), had it been available and in effect for these years would have bridged the gap between those numbers somewhat.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

County Gas Tax?

The Peoria Journal Star today has an article speaking to the inclination of some Woodford County Board members to do something with the 1% "Public Safety" sales tax.

We believe there is an embarassment of riches there.

Specifically a trial balloon seems to have gone up from the Board regarding eliminating the County sales tax on fuel purchases at retail. We don't think the short term savings (one or two cents per gallon) justifies such a knee-jerk reaction.


We do, however, find a plan to retire early the bonds which funded the new "Public Safety" complex intriguing.

We've got the tax. We're living with it. Accelerate the repayment of the debt, to the extent the agreement allows, plan for a lean "Public Safety" budget, and ultimately reduce the cost to property tax payers.

Woodford County's future should not include a business unfriendly permanent 1% "Public Safety" sales tax, nor a balancing of the "public safety" budget on the backs of property owners. There must be a middle ground to plow.

Please review this previous post for County revenues.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Letters From: FirstClassEducation.com

In Response To Our Recent "School District Spending" Piece:

Patrick M. Byrne
President and Chairman
Overstock.com, Inc.



America’s Classrooms, Teachers & Students Come First
with the 65% Solution

By Dr. Patrick Byrne

Ben Franklin famously said, “A penny saved is a penny earned.” For K-12 education funding, a few pennies saved could mean literally billions of dollars earned for America’s classrooms. That’s the driving force behind First Class Education, a thriving national movement to enact the 65% Solution.

It’s a simple idea. If we can get the business side of education to adopt better business practices, we would have more money for the education side of education. Business schools throughout America teach management techniques called “best practices” and “benchmarking” – determine what the most efficient companies in a given field are doing and apply similar goals for your firm. In the business of K-12 public school education, First Class Education proposes the benchmark of placing 65% of operational budgets in the classroom.

According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), just four years ago seven states across America -- from Utah to Maine, Tennessee to New York -- placed at least 65% of their operational budgets in the classroom. Now only two states do. Four years ago fourteen states placed less than 60% of their budgets in the classroom. Now twenty states aren’t even getting 60% to their classrooms. The NCES has reported dramatic recent increases in K-12 education funding – four times the rate of inflation – while for four straight years the percentage of dollars reaching America’s classrooms has declined. Just 61.3% is now reaching our classrooms as a national average. We can and must do better.

If we were to increase that average to 65%, America’s classrooms would have an additional $14 billion a year without a tax increase. Just 3.7 cents more per dollar to our classrooms would be enough to buy a new computer for every student in America or hire 300,000 additional teachers with a starting salary of $40,000, or a near doubling of classroom supplies.. Small change can equal a big change.

To see what the 65% Solution would mean for your state visit: www.firstclasseducation.org.

Plenty of possibilities exist to save money if school districts had an incentive to be innovative. In Nevada, the Clark County school district recently cut their electric bills with the incentive of giving 10% of the savings back to school principals for their school’s use. The savings: more than $9 million by just turning the computers and lights off at night and stopping the fiddling with the thermostats. In Oregon, the Hillsboro school district will save close to $2 million over the next three years by its recent competitive-bidding of maintenance services. In these examples, “millions saved are millions earned.”

And plenty examples of largess exist in many, if not most school districts. Florida’s Miami-Dade school district has over 240 employees making more than $100,000 a year. Not one is a teacher. Arizona’s Deer Valley school district has 101 school buses, but also 167 cars. In Minnesota a district superintendent recently resigned mid-contract and received $440,000 in severance in addition to his lifetime pension and health insurance.

Nearly every teacher can easily identify waste outside the classroom while they are spending money out of their own limited pockets for basic classroom supplies.

As sound as placing more of our education money in the classroom is for teachers and taxpayers, it’s equally important for students. Rank all 50 states by standardized test scores and you’ll find the top five states place the highest percentage in the classroom – averaging 64.12%. The bottom five states for test scores place the lowest percentage in the classroom – averaging 59.46%. Research by Colorado’s Independence Institute shows the percentage of dollars reaching the classroom had five times greater correlation with increased test scores than simply spending more money.

Thankfully, change is coming. First Class Education was founded less than a year ago, but already Louisiana and Kansas have adopted 65% proposals. Texas Governor Rick Perry enacted the 65% Solution by executive order. Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue will sign 65% Solution legislation into law this week. Supporters in Colorado this week submitted over 100,000 signatures to place the issue before voters this November. Missouri Governor Matt Blunt and Florida Governor Jen Bush are supporting legislative efforts to refer the 65% Solution to their November ballots. Citizen initiative drives are underway in Arizona, Ohio, Oregon and Washington. And Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty is pushing a 70% in the classroom requirement for his state.

Let’s support our teachers, benefit our students and be responsible to our taxpayers by ensuring that at least 65% of our education tax dollars reach the place that makes the difference – America’s classrooms.

Dr. Patrick Byrne is the Founder and President of Overstock.com and the National Advisory Chairman of First Class Education.